Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election

Baujard, A., Igersheim, H., Lebon, I., Gavrel, F., & Laslier, J.-F. (n.d.). Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election. Electoral Studies. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.003

ABSTRACT

Abstract
Under evaluative voting, the voter freely grades each candidate on a numerical scale, with the winning candidate being determined by the sum of the grades they receive. This paper compares evaluative voting with the two-round system, reporting on an experiment, conducted during the 2012 French presidential election, which attracted 2,340 participants. Here we show that the two-round system favors “exclusive” candidates, that is candidates who elicit strong feelings, while evaluative rules favor “inclusive” candidates, that is candidates who attract the support of a large span of the electorate. These differences are explained by two complementary reasons: the opportunity for the voter to support several candidates under evaluative voting rules, and the specific pattern of strategic voting under the two-round voting rule.

Vai al sito web