Segnalazione bibliografica. Autori: Heinz Brandenburg e Marcel Van Egmond British Journal of Political Science 42, 441-463 (April 2012) Abstract This study reassesses the ability of the mass media to influence voter opinions directly. Combining data on media content with individuals’ assessments of British political parties during the 2005 general election campaign allows a test of newspapers’ persuasive influence in a way previously considered a ‘virtual impossibility’. Utilizing repeated measures from the 2005 BES campaign panel, multilevel regression analysis reveals significant impact of partisan slant not just on the evaluation of the party mentioned but also on evaluations of its competitor(s). The strongest evidence of...

The left/right semantic is used widely to describe the patterns of party competition in democratic countries. This article examines the patterns of party policy in Anglo-American and Western European countries on three dimensions of left/right disagreement: wealth redistribution, social morality and immigration. The central questions are whether, and why, parties with left-wing or right-wing positions on the economy systematically adopt left-wing or right-wing positions on immigration and social morality. The central argument is that left/right disagreement is asymmetrical: leftists and rightists derive from different sources, and thus structure in different ways, their opinions about policy. Drawing on evidence from Benoit and Laver’s (2006) survey of experts about the policy positions of political parties, the results of the empirical analysis indicate that party policy on the economic, social and immigration dimensions are bound together by parties on the left, but not by parties on the right. The article concludes with an outline of the potential implications of left/right asymmetry for unified theories of party competition.

Segnalazione bibliografica. Autore: Timothy Hellwig Comparative Political Studies January 2012 vol. 45 no. 1 91-118 Abstract A positive relationship between economic performance and support for incumbents is routinely taken as evidence that elections work for accountability. Recent investigations into this relationship have examined just how signals from the economy translate into popular support. However, neither selection models nor sanctioning models explicitly incorporate the actions of political elites. This article advances a strategic parties model of economic voting. Political incumbents have incentives to adjust their policy positions in response to economic conditions. When parties advocate distinct positions on economic issues, elections can be understood in...

Nel corso degli ultimi 20 anni il sistema partitico del nostro paese è stato attraversato da profondi mutamenti. Dopo la lunga stagione del pluralismo estremo e polarizzato degli anni della Prima Repubblica, a partire dal 1994 si è progressivamente mosso verso un sistema bipolare con alternanza caratterizzato da alti livelli di frammentazione e discontinuità dell’offerta politica, fino alla svolta quasi-bipartitica delle elezioni del 2008. Il capitolo ha l’obiettivo di analizzare il cambiamento del sistema partitico italiano avvenuto con le elezioni del 2013 dalle quali è emerso un sistema sostanzialmente tripolare che ha stravolto l’assetto bipolare precedente in un quadro di crescente destrutturazione e di fluidità elettorale che ha pochi eguali nella storia elettorale dell’Europa occidentale. Quali sono le caratteristiche del nuovo sistema partitico italiano? Quali fattori lo hanno determinato? Cosa spiega la sua perenne instabilità? Servendosi di molteplici indicatori e attraverso un approccio empirico e attento alla comparazione con altri casi europei il capitolo cercherà di dare risposta a questi interrogativi.