Ricerca

Ricerca

Ricerca

To cite the article: Emanuele, V., Improta, M., Marino, B., and Verzichelli, L. (2022) Going technocratic? Diluting governing responsibility in electorally turbulent times, West European Politics, DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2022.2095494 The article, published on West European Politics, can be accessed here Abstract Technocracy has recently triggered growing scholarly interest, especially as an alternative form of ruling to both party government and populism. In the context of weakened parties-citizens links and increasing external constraints faced by Western European ruling parties, technocratic appointments might help deal with...

È online il tredicesimo Dossier CISE, pubblicato dalla casa editrice Luiss University Press e dedicato alla tornata ordinaria di elezioni amministrative del 2019. Il Dossier è curato da Aldo Paparo ed è scaricabile gratuitamente tramite questo link. Il 2019 è stato per l’Italia un anno denso di appuntamenti elettorali. Il 26 maggio, infatti, gli elettori sono stati chiamati alle urne per il rinnovo del Parlamento Europeo (a cui il CISE ha dedicato molteplici approfondimenti contenuti nel volume originale edito da Lorenzo De Sio, Mark Franklin e Luana Russo) e per il rinnovo di...

Maggini, N. (2010). Giovani e partecipazione. Quaderni Del Circolo Rosselli, 107(2), 134–136.

Segnalazione bibliografica. Autori: Heinz Brandenburg e Marcel Van Egmond British Journal of Political Science 42, 441-463 (April 2012) Abstract This study reassesses the ability of the mass media to influence voter opinions directly. Combining data on media content with individuals’ assessments of British political parties during the 2005 general election campaign allows a test of newspapers’ persuasive influence in a way previously considered a ‘virtual impossibility’. Utilizing repeated measures from the 2005 BES campaign panel, multilevel regression analysis reveals significant impact of partisan slant not just on the evaluation of the party mentioned but also on evaluations of its competitor(s). The strongest evidence of...

A wide range of studies find that democracies experience more terrorism than non-democracies. However, surprisingly little terrorism research takes into account the variation among democracies in terms of their electoral institutions. Furthermore, despite much discussion of the differences in terrorist groups’ goals in the literature, little quantitative work distinguishes among groups with different goals, and none explores whether and how the influence of electoral institutions varies among groups with different goals. The argument in this article posits that electoral institutions influence the emergence of within-system groups, which seek policy changes, but do not influence the emergence of anti-system groups, which seek a complete overthrow of the existing regime and government. The study finds that within-system groups are significantly less likely to emerge in democracies that have a proportional representation system and higher levels of district magnitude, while neither of these factors affects the emergence of anti-system groups.