De Sio, L., & Paparo, A. (2014). Elettori alla deriva? I flussi di voto tra il 2008 e il 2013. In Terremoto elettorale. Le elezioni politiche del 2013 (pp. 129–152). Bologna: Il Mulino.

Emanuele, V., & Serricchio, F. (2014). Le collocazioni sinistra-destra e la scelta di voto. In Pasquino, G. e Venturino, F. (a cura di),Il PD secondo Matteo (Vol. Il Partito Democratico secondo Matteo, pp. 133–150). Bologna: BUP.

CHIARAMONTE, A. C. A., & Sio, L. D. (2014). Premessa. In A. Chiaramonte & L. D. Sio (Eds.), Terremoto elettorale. Le elezioni politiche del 2013 (pp. 7–14). BOLOGNA: Il Mulino.

De Sio, L., & Cataldi, M. (2014). Tanto tuonò che piovve: Il risultato delle elezioni. In Terremoto elettorale. Le elezioni politiche del 2013 (pp. 97–128). Bologna: Il Mulino.

Abstract Under evaluative voting, the voter freely grades each candidate on a numerical scale, with the winning candidate being determined by the sum of the grades they receive. This paper compares evaluative voting with the two-round system, reporting on an experiment, conducted during the 2012 French presidential election, which attracted 2,340 participants. Here we show that the two-round system favors “exclusive” candidates, that is candidates who elicit strong feelings, while evaluative rules favor “inclusive” candidates, that is candidates who attract the support of a large span of the electorate. These differences are explained by two complementary reasons: the opportunity for the voter to support several candidates under evaluative voting rules, and the specific pattern of strategic voting under the two-round voting rule.